E-Cat World Reader Survey

I am always interested to learn about the views of the readers of E-Cat World, and I hope that we can provide people with a useful and enjoyable experience as they visit the site. In efforts to improve the site I have created a short survey to collect reader opinions and ideas. I would be very grateful if ECW readers would take a few moments to fill it out and submit it.

The survey is anonymous, no personal data is collected or stored, and the responses will not be published. I will read the responses carefully and with interest, and consider all suggestions as I plan for future development of E-Cat World.

Click here to take the survey:

Many thanks to all,

Frank Acland

  • elasticbucket

    It is excellent to bear in mind community sentiment, needs and want’s. Thanks.

  • maozhijie

    I am from china.

  • maozhijie

    It is good website, e-cat may have big sale in china in the future.

  • NT

    Thanks, I did the survey and appreciated that opportunity…

  • artefact

    On JONP:

    Frank Acland
    September 21st, 2013 at 4:07 PM
    Dear Andrea,

    You have explained how you are not as free as you once were to talk about your work here on the JONP. You have spoken in the past how you have received useful information from your readers on this site. Do you still see this site as a source of information helpful to your work?

    Many thanks,

    Frank Acland


    Andrea Rossi
    September 21st, 2013 at 6:47 PM
    Frank Acland:
    Absolutely yes!
    In any case I will continue this dialogue, which of course will reach its climax when we will publish the results of the work in course.
    Warm Regards,

    • Allan Kiik

      Dialogue means at least two parties are communicating, if Andrea can not talk about eCat any more then it’s over. How can readers suggest new ideas when there can’t be any feedback or hints from Rossi?

  • georgehants

    I think it important to remember that this is a fringe Website comparable from the establishments point of view to Websites arguing for the Evidence to be looked at on UFO’s, Placebo Effect, Telepathy etc. etc. all of which have more solid Evidence showing there reality than Cold Fusion.
    All on here, with irrational sceptics removed are not following the Establishment dictates that Cold Fusion is fairyland science and should be ignored.
    Is this the way science should be conducted?