Dr. Stoyan Sarg to Address Nanotek & Expo 2014 on LENR

Canadian Physicist Dr. Stoyan Sarg has been invited to the 4th International Nanotek & Expo confererence to be held on Dececmber 1-3, 2014 in San Francisco, where he will be co-chair of the section Nanotechnology in Energy Systems. He will present a talk “Physical models of LENR processes using the BSM-SG atomic models”.

He will be also a keynote speaker on day 3 of the conference where he will present an address titled, “Graphical 3D modeling of molecules and nanostructures in sub-nanometer scale with the BSM-SG atomic models”. See here for an abstract.

Dr. Sarg tells E-Cat World:

“In the speech I will mention some important things from my last year’s talk that was recently published in the General Science Journal (http://gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Essays/View/5748)

“At the beginning it discuses the major methodological error in scattering experiments that leads to a tremendously wrong vision about the Coulomb barrier. As a result the quantum mechanical models of atomic nuclei and atoms are only mathematical. The physical models are completely different.

“In my new talk I will discuss also the nuclear process using the Lugano report material. When I use my BSM-SG models the process it is so evident and logical that I could say a peace of cake, but it is impossible to be inferred from quantum mechanical models.

“This process however appear different from the earlier reports by Rossi and Focardi, when they observed a copper in the ashes. I think that Rossi has more than one processes and perhaps keeps one as a secret.”

  • Gerard McEk

    For some reason I like Stoyan’s theories. The structure of the nucleus he invented, calculated and predicts with his theory, much better resembles the behaviour of matter than other theories. I am not a physicist and I wonder how those who have studied physics think about it.

    • Andreas Moraitis

      One might expect that Sarg’s theory would also be relevant for hot fusion reactions – provided that the local differences in the Coulomb barrier do not cancel each other out in this case. Imagine what that could mean for astrophysics. If we had suddenly to deal with different ignition temperatures and reaction rates, the history of the universe would almost certainly have to be rewritten. That’s why I guess that most physicists will remain cautious as long as not all possible consequences of such a model are discussed and documented.

      • Gerard McEk

        Thanks Andeas for your reply. How wellknown is he within the physics community? Is he also silenced and banned like those who work on LENR?

        • Andreas Moraitis

          I have no idea. There are a number of publications by Sarg in peer-reviewed journals, but apparently nothing in Nature or Science. He had one paper in the Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, which is top-notch, but not related to nuclear physics:

          http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Stoyan_Sargoytchev/publications

  • If true, this information could be incredibly valuable to LENR researchers and help them devise new ways to increase COP and maintain stability.

  • Ophelia Rump

    I wonder who got to decide the physical model of the Coulomb barrier?
    Was that some early barricade against LENR research?
    Could such things be done deliberately?
    That might make very interesting reading, it would be a great introductory story to “Rossi The Movie”.

    • Warthog

      Mother Nature, of course……you can’t fool HER.

      • Ophelia Rump

        No, I meant the incorrect physical model which does not match the mathematical model or the Mother Nature model which you referenced, the one physicists use.
        The one where LENR is impossible.

        P.S. This is an open call to all conspiracy theorists out there.
        Be the first to expose the dark conspiracy.

        • bkrharold

          I don’t believe there was a conspiracy to hide the truth behind an incorrect model. It is natural to use objects with which we are familiar to visualize a problem, manipulate them in our minds, and try to divine a solution. The problem with using this technique for subatomic particles and their interactions, is that nobody really knows what they might look like, or even if it really makes sense to use these simple analogies for problem solving at this scale.

    • Ivy Matt

      Charles-Augustin de Coulomb developed what became known as Coulomb’s Law in 1785. I hardly need tell you that he was a contemporary of Adam Weishaupt, founder of the Bavarian Illuminati.

  • GreenWin

    The “measurement problem” makes all quantum models suspect. If enough people resonate with Sarg’s theory, we will likely find supporting evidence for it. Imagine.

  • Axil Axil

    LENR proves the newly emergent theory that quantized Casimir electromagnetic forces effect the protons and neutrons in the nucleus as a manifestation of the weak force which is mediated by mesons. This theory answers quantitative questions about the Casimir force and points to the critical role of electron plasmas as central to LENR.
    More info will be provided to any who are interested.