Your 2015 LENR Predictions

I was expecting for the holiday season this year to be rather quiet on the LENR front.

With the Lugano test report published and Andrea Rossi in a quiet period regarding the development of the E-Cat, it is likely we won’t get much significant news about Industrial Heat’s activities for quite some time. Rossi has mentioned a year-long run of his 1 MW Plant for testing purposes, which could conceivably take us into 2016 before the plant is revealed to the public.

However, there has been a surprising amount of activity in the waning days of the year. Since Christmas day we have learned about the MFMP’s invitation to visit Prof. Francesco Piantelli in Italy for an intensive period of study; the report of Prof. Alexander Parkhomov’s Hot Cat experiment has been published, and the first MFMP Dog Bone live open science experiment has been carried out.

So with 2014 ending on a bang, I thought I’d put up a thread for readers here to post their predictions for 2015. What do you expect to see in the world of LENR this year — and where might we be at this time next year?

Happy New Year to all ECW readers. Thanks for your interest, participation and all your support!

  • Chris the 2nd

    This will be the year physics wakes up to the fact of LENR.

  • Anon2012_2014

    Successful multiple public replications at high power well above the noise.

  • Pekka Janhunen

    For anyone who likes to replicate, now is the time to do it. The fruit is hanging so low that one has to bow.

    • deleo77

      Blacklight Power will publicly demonstrate a 1.5 KW SunCell reactor in the first half of 2015. It will be a watershed moment in the search for new forms of energy. The media will be all over it. I know BLP is not too popular here, but I am just trying to call it like I see it and not take into account Mills disdain for the LENR community. I just think BLP’s technology and engineering is much further advanced than anything else I have seen out there. I am putting it under LENR predictions because I think that LENR and Mills Hydrino theory are in the same scientific neighborhood (but even Mills would not agree with that).

      • Oceans2014

        As to Mills disdain for the LENR community – who needs a BlackLight when you can have real Cold Fusion for the home, Mills has already sold out to big electric.

        • LilyLover

          If China can reverse engineer a “stealth” UFO, they can reverse engineer CIHT. Basically, cheap energy is simply beyond control.

      • Mats002

        Mills is in this game: “LiAlH4 + Ni as a hydrogen dissociator run at elevated temperature is disclosed in my patents. They are filed in Russia” look for it in thread at https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg100464.html

        • Omega Z

          However, the LiAlH4 + Ni can not itself be patented.

          I believe Mills, like Rossi is going through development pains. I also think both techniques will have their own best uses as will other LENR products that work in a specific manner.

          I also think these technologies are all from the same root with different extraction techniques. Even if Mills wont admit it.

          Mill original reactor looked very much like Rossi’s Hot cat & video of such is available on YouTube tho Mills device is prettier. He had much more funding available.

          Mills had the same issues as everyone else with that design. Scaling up & obtaining high temps continuously. He has merely moved on to a different approach. I wonder if DGT’s or Brillouins spark technology lead to his new approach.

          • Mark Underwood

            On the surface Mill’s heat activated Nickel power experiment – as ‘validated’ at Rowan University a few years ago, seems to be akin to Rossi’s eCat. But the reaction results are very different. Mills got a large spike of heat which quickly faded, while Rossi’s eCat just keeps on going for weeks and weeks. Mill’s problem was twofold (at least) it seems to me: trying to overcome what was quenching the reaction and recovering the catalyst from the powder reaction products.

            Now of course Mills is into detonating water. Talk about a totally different approach, and wow, given it works as advertised, how can it not be a game changer.

            Mill’s Suncell has the power density and the eCat has the energy density. A little bit of water explodes violently in burst of light, vs a little bit of powder that just keeps on going giving off heat.

          • deleo77

            The turning water into light process is why I think Mills is on to something. He can put that light on to photovoltaics and go directly to energy. He doesn’t need steam turbines or any type of big energy plant to turn heat into power because the solar cells he is using can harness the power of a 1000 suns.

            According to Mills in his July demo the SunCell prototype should be ready sometime around now. But Mills briefly stated in an interview in September that achieving the necessary power density is proving to be a challenge. I am sure BLP has run into several engineering headaches trying to scale up the reaction and make it reliable in a commercial product. Still, BLP got a fresh round of $16MM in funding and they have top engineering firms partnering with them to develop the SunCell. So while the prototype is likely not going to be finished on schedule, I would wager that something will be ready to demonstrate within the next 6 months.

    • artefact

      I hope it will be the year of many replications and looking into LENR by many more industrial entities.

      • bachcole

        My kinda guy. No prediction, just hope. I predicted, but all that prediction is just ego. An asteroid might knock us all out, or Ebola, or ISIS, or SHT might actually be real. Who the frick knows?

        • Pekka Janhunen

          By the way what is SHT?

          • Pekka Janhunen

            Ok, I found it, Solar Hydrogen Trends. I’m a bit TLA challenged.

          • BroKeeper

            My serious prediction is once Rossi/IH reach the sixth month into the customer’s test the investment numbers will justify preparation for new customers by building up E-Cat inventory. They will be hiring service engineers for installation / maintenance and marketing people for sales and advertising to ready for year-end customer demo PR and commercialization.
            I am sure IH’s investors will be getting antsy by then when competitor pressure, other test verifications and possible media releases builds their angst to release it first and to assert public confidence. This bringing to a Happy New Year!!

          • there are sure many players who prepare to be visible.

          • the PTB are just a gang of aristocrats who are deluded no better than Saudi.
            I bet on stupidity, groupthink, self enforced ignorance, cassandra cursed experts,…

            there is no secret LENR , just stupid ego of physicist, media diva and fearful bureaucrats who are sure LENr is bunk.

          • I predict a messy and confusing year marked by emerging legal battles, but also the beginning of a profound economic expansion and realignment. I 80% predict the long-awaited public and scientific acceptance.

          • I confirm. patent war, e-cat license conflicts.

            question is whether the players will understand quickly that the cake is too big to battle for a share.

  • georgehants

    The West will become a banana republic while Russia, China and North Korea become fabulously rich selling Cold Fusion devices to the backward natives.

  • Ophelia Rump

    The first build your own LENR reactor kits will begin to appear on the internet.
    They will actually work, the output will be a modest COP 3. Useful only for home heating.
    The prices and options available will be comparable to HHO devices.
    Most of them will be available at first from HHO websites.

    • Mats002

      You are my miss!

  • Zeddicus Zul Zorander

    I predicted some time ago that Q1 2015 would be the moment LENR would go mainstream so I’m sticking to that. Hope I’m right. Commercial products will take some more time though.

  • BroKeeper

    Earlier this year I predicted gasoline prices will drop below $3.00/gallon – HA! So now I predict some of the predictions previously given will come true and some will fail and I predict this prediction will be 100% accurate. Please drop a dollar in the plate on your way out.

  • Mats002

    Chinese people invented LENR. Western people name it fireworks.
    Happy 2015 from Sweden.

  • Guru

    Year 2015 will year of STEORN. Not year of Rossi. In my eyes Rossi and IH boys too morally failed.

    • psi2u2

      What do you mean by “morally failed”?

  • NT

    I predict that 2015 will keep Frank hustling to keep us all well informed on the New Fire happenings. Hey Frank, as a developer and website mgr for many years myself, I can/do REALLY appreciate your fine work and commitment to this site. God bless and Happy New Year to you and yours and to all the viewers and contributors to this site – even George – Ha!

    • psi2u2

      Indeed.

  • Mats002

    What is the price of a cigarr those times?
    Happy new year to you and your family!

  • NT

    Now that Cuba and the USA are friendly (or shortly will be) those big ole Cuban cigars will have a good function in celebrating the many New Fire breakthroughs that seem inevitable to go “Mainstream” in 2015…

  • Hi all

    Oil at $30 per Barrel

    Kind Regards walker

    • Chris, Italy

      It’s already been going that way, OPEC is already allowing it, suggesting they’re getting unable to hold their cartel up and reckon they may as well just sell as much as they can.

  • Omega Z

    Mills is still struggling with issues like the rest. And he does keep certain IP to himself They all do. No one intentionally helps the competition by providing all the answers.

    • Gerard McEk

      I think MFMP will be successful and the DogBone project will generate considerable excess energy. Alexander Parkhomov will get governmetal backup and a large Rusian LENR project will take-off. The same thing will happen every where in the world, possibly not opely.
      IH/Rossi will prove that their 1 MW plant works. It will be the start of the large scale production of the Ecat for industrial purposes.
      I hope to see that other LENR and LENR (like) companies publish big steps in LENR and that the first stand allone self sustaining LENR generator appears.

  • Omega Z

    Absorption chillers is already big business, but is to expensive at the residential(single/double households) scale. It’s the hardware cost, not the energy cost. $30,000 for a 5 ton unit not installed plus all the extras. About 10 times the cost of a heat pump. If electricity becomes cheaper, Chillers will never be able to compete in the residential market.

    The market for Absorption chillers tho, will increase. Smaller businesses will find it economical as will high rise & large apartment complex’s as they can make economical use of both the heat & chillers from a centralized installation. Many already have the distribution system installed.

  • Omega Z

    Actually, If it expands the economy & removes 10 million people off welfare, the Government will have a windfall in unspent revenue. And it’s a 2 for. They will receive another windfall in additional income tax revenue from the 10 million newly employed.

    Specific use taxes will need replaced. If everyone switches to electric vehicles, they will need to apply a mileage tax to pay for roads, bridges etc. To expect otherwise isn’t being realistic.

    • f sedei

      Someone once said ” If is a big word”.

  • Chris I

    Happy New Year!!!!!

    Uh, predictions? Well, simple… now.

    Up till the Day of (unOrthodox) Christmas, it wasn’t simple to predict. But since that Day it’s become simple to predict. Everybody and their Bobe mit Beytsim is gonna be following the instructions Александр published, everybody’s gonna be doin’ it, doin’ it; pickin’ their nose’n’chewin’ it, chewin’ it.

    All that remains to predict is whether this will resolve the controversy, inflame it all the more or what.

  • f sedei

    In my eyes “Politics”.

  • Pekka Janhunen

    In Mills’ case and in many others, in my opinion there is not much reason to be interested, because there is not even a claim. I mean a quantitative claim that third party testers could experimentally verify if given a permission. There is no point in discussing credibility, qualifications, correctness etc. if there is not even a claim.

  • Bill gates interest seems to have already more weight than Elforsk .
    Something is happening in Russia, and not only parkhomov but something among russian, ukrainian, kasakh bloggers.

    academic will accept LENr when they will loose their budget for hot fusion, and will be paid for cold fusion. not before. some will prefer to hang than to admit their pathetic denial. Greed is not the worst, as sincere passion and group solidarity are the main fuel of the biggest horrors.

    • Valeriy Tarasov

      “sincere passion and group solidarity are the main fuel of the biggest horrors”

      Good point, I am absolutely agree.

  • to make prediction first we have to see what is in the pipe, sure or probable, also identify the undecidable …
    then see what can be good or evil blackswan.

    E-cat powerplant should be qualified (not juse, but later… autumn)… it can be a bomb, or be ignored… the level of general stupidity, of groupthink, is so high that it can even be ignored.
    an evil blackswan can also make it fail.

    what will be the impact of Airbus conference. The trajectory I extrapolate is that it will be a bomb. but a blackswan in the 8 next days can make it crash. one should not underestimate the infinite and desperate stupidity of mindguards who have already killed many private sector initiative to fund LENR (F&P, Hagelstein, LENR-Cities 2012).
    On the opposite if the mindguard fails, seeing how the move of Bill gates is discussed in social media, Oxford conference will be Hiroshima. This pmean that a second bomb will have to be droped until the deluded Emperors of truth admit they were wrong and surrender to reality.
    Again we should be careful as the mindguard have infinite power over the minds of mainstream PTB.

    what will be the production of LENR-Cities in 2015 ? Their strategy is to be operational quickly. In 2015 I imagine thay will get funding, industrialist partnership, seserach programs, all cross fertilized, and nurished too by works of others. what can be the production of a group of scientists, stimulated by industrialists, who work together in relative trust instead of hiding their secrets all the time? blackswan…

    LENR-Cities plan to have valuable technology in 3 years instead of the expected 5 of unusual innovation… see how Rossi E-cat evolved quickly when working with Cherokee… imagine that at power 10 in an ecosystem instead of a team… it is an essential blackswan. impoissible to predict.

    many other actors will start to show their existence to participate. It have started.

    among them Brillouin is to follow… it is uncertain whether they have a working HHT or not…

    BLP is for me a dead horse, but it can be a positive blackswan.

    National instruments, Toyota, Mitsubishi, BARC, Russia, China, STM… nothing concrete is planned, but who knows. especially for the japanese.
    Maybe in 2015 they will feel forced to communicate.

    for me 2015 will be the year where the players will have to get out of the wood, to talk publicly. It is started.

    beside that there will be the non players.

    what about oil ? probably it will continue to collapse until the bottom price that only Saudi can make money with for a decade.

    What about nuclear fission industry ? some explain that in such disruptive innovation , they will refuse to consider good opportunities and will try to keep their old model.
    reva should work on remediation, transmutation, and beside that it will be unable to downsize.
    Alsthome, GE may propose mid sized powerplant but probably too big.
    in 2015 they will maybe be attacked on budget and investments… forced to see the facts.

    maybe the revolution will came from companies like chafotteaux&maury, whirlpool, darty, or free telecom… maybe in 2015 one of those kind of mid-cap industries will join LENR-cities or an equivalent initiative in US zone, Russian zone, Asia…

    it will be even harder to manage for grid utilities like ErDF. their model is dead so they will deny the problem and will not migrate to microgrid, nanogrid, non-intermittent smart grid. my bet is that they will kill the grid and will by stupidity promote building-nanogrid electricity, and appliance picogrid.
    in 2015 they will ignore all

    academic will deny all reality until
    – their budget are cut
    – new budget are proposed for cold fusion

    the most fanatic will hang to avoid admitting the reality.

    another story is the impact of LENR information on AGW debate…
    LENR bring a solution to CO2 perceived problem.
    the problem is that most supporter of AGW use that concept to push malthusians solution, and LENR propose a cornucopian solution. my bet is that they will oppose LENR as evil. I have started already to see that.

    however the population will not understand that reaction. big part of the population is however well brainwashed by media and will swallod the pathetic justification to reject LENR, but a growing part of the population, starting by population who have understood that AGW is a political vehicle for some watermelon (some skeptic or not on AGW), some that are attacked on their profession (farmers, nuke) will start to challenge the brainwashing more generally.
    LENr gives a hope of future comfort and today more and more people have understood that green revolution is mostly regression (higher cost, less comfort), and that the main message is malthusian and guiltiness.
    I don’t think that AGW skeptics will win, but the malthusian messages will be rejected with an hypocritical to “AGW is real and solved, alleluyah”. even skeptics will sign just to end the effect that they opposed (attack on poors development, attack on comfort, planet government and regulation, government by unchallengeable scientists)

    what could help skeptic to win, is that LENr will be an example of scientific groupthink, but history shows that science quickly rebuild a myth to avoid to admit it’s error.
    my prediction is that in 2015 AGW skeptics will try to use LENR denial as an example of bad mainstream science, but I bet it will not convince later.

    it is hopeful as otherwise many pseudo science will try to exploit that fiasco. they already try.
    I bet it will not work.

  • Guru

    My God, I repeat Third Time: I NEVER demand “gives the E-cat to the public”.
    I lived in communism 25 years, I not propagandize communism.

  • I hope to see a successful replication from MFMP by the end of january. If this happens all things following are unpredictable.

    • Sanjeev

      Except you can be certain of one thing, there will be more replications by others once this is done.

  • Chris, Italy

    First, they can’t tax me. 😛

    Second, rememner the ancient story about the King commanding the tide not to rise. They say he got himself drowned.

  • catfish

    I predict continued verifications of LENR by isolated researchers and small groups.

  • I predict MFMP will be highly instrumental in breaking through the barrier of ignorance regarding CF/LENR. They, with the help of Frank’s Ecat World, will surpass the efforts of Industrial Heat. Secrecy and the capitalistic path will slow IH to the point where MFMP will pass them and get a lot of the deserved credit for awakening the world-stage to replicatable Cold Fusion.

  • georgehants
    • Mark Szl

      The comment by Abd ulRahman LomaxJanuary 2, 2015 at 11:10 AM is very relevant and sounds disappointingly AGAIN like we have just another experimental error / artifact. Excess power, no LENR. The comment follows:

      ** I will add that 2015 will be a year of disappointments for many LENR hopefuls and followers /”believers.” Skeptics, pathological and not, will be of course delighted.

      The
      Parkhomov report is based on a single measure. There is accessory data
      reported, basically reactor temperature vs time and radiation vs time,
      but the only data used in COP calculation is input power for three
      periods, which are not accurately specified, and water lost, which is
      reported in multiples of 0.2 Kg, and the first of these periods, the
      loss is 0.2 Kg. The actual weight measurements are not given, nor are
      the measurement times nor how the samples were taken. Parkhomov looked
      very good. However, when it was examined closely — first by that “best
      scientist” and then by me — problems appeared. That scientist framed
      some of these in terms of how the behavior might not resemble other cold
      fusion reports. But there was something much more solid than that, and I
      have not seen that Peter understands it. Contrary to not behaving like
      expectations, the experiment, in the temperature data provided, behaves
      *exactly* as would be expected from no XP. This is strong, and would
      require some very odd coincidences to be consistent with XP. But the
      steam evaporation data shows substantial XP. The scientist then looked
      at that, and it also shows a sign that it’s artifact (I have not
      verified that, beyond the suspiciously linear nature of the COP vs input
      power). At this point, we have what appears to be error, somewhere.
      Experimental fact is experimental fact, but what were the experimental
      facts? When we look at Parkhomov closely, which took me days to
      understand, the missing data becomes obvious. Parkhomov did not actually
      calibrate, in spite of saying that he did. I don’t know all the facts,
      for sure, but what he reports is inconsistent with an actual calibration
      of the experiment. He calibrated something *else,* and the most likely
      error would be lost water that is not evaporated, which will vary
      greatly with exact boiler conditions, and a non-exact calibration will
      not reproduce those conditions.

      Self-sustain should be possible
      with the Parkhomov approach, if the XP is real. But that is *not* the
      first step. The first step would be to actually calibrate Parkhomov, by
      running the exact same conditions as the experiment, as to materials,
      arrangement, etc., with only the LiAlH4 missing from the fuel, and using
      the same input power protocol. Suppose Parkhomov did this and reported
      it. If this calibration showed that not only is water being evaporated
      at such and such a rate, but the reactor is getting much hotter with
      fuel than without, Parkhomov would be *conclusive,* not merely an
      indication. Two independent measures.

      We’d still want to see
      confirmation, but at that point, if I were involved, I’d be planning for
      self-sustain. Very simple, it should be. At worst, with multiple
      reactors, which can be just the “fuel tubes,” a small input power would
      leverage a far, far larger output power. These tubes have very high
      hydrogen pressure in them, but only a small actual quantity, 100 mg of
      hydrogen. One wants to be prepared for container failure, but that’s
      pretty simple. These are not going to produce a huge explosion if they
      run away. Just a small amount of relatively low-velocity shrapnel, if it
      doesn’t just crack and fizzle, and some fire hazard, I presume that the
      released hydrogen would immediately burn at operating temperature when
      it hits the air. It would not explode unless it accumulated in a space
      without burning and was then ignited.

      Parkhomov fuel tubes should
      be very cheap. MFMP should be making them, ASAP. There are assembly
      details so that the resulting ceramic is completely gas-tight, able to
      withstand high pressure. They know that now!

      • SG

        Parkhomov claimed he ran calibration with a dummy, which was within 10% of what was expected without the powder.

  • BroKeeper

    Very interesting predictions of probable scenarios suggesting 2015 will be a year full of anticipation and surprises from many external and internal LENR developments. As mentioned earlier by NT, Frank will be very busy sorting all this out for the readers from expanding global media attention (mostly translated web articles).

    Frank, have you considered hiring assistance for administration, research and moderation to free up your analytical journalistic skills? Maybe you and AlainCo, ‘LENR Forum’ administrator, could consider joining forces complimenting each other’s unique journalistic views; perhaps calling it ‘New Fire’ with a main focus on the E-Cat. Or is my crystal ball having a short circuit?

  • Pekka Janhunen

    “They must call Press Conference, show some papaers, tests, some demo on podium.” Rossi did that in 2011. Result: AP reporter was there, but never wrote anything. The press didn’t believe because there was no independent confirmation. To address this problem, the TPR1 and TPR2 were done; of course it took time because the schedule was now set by the independents. Rossi cannot speed up what must be independent of him.

    I share your frustration about large energy investments made just to tear them down, but it seems to me that Rossi has done what he can to speed up the process. Now we are only 3 months past TPR2 and the oil price is falling and thereby slowing down energy investments and mitigating the problem you pointed out. (I don’t know if oil price is falling because of TPR2, but it could well be, and anyway the end result is the same.)

    In my opinion, the E-cat device has developed consistently and relatively rapidly over time if one considers the demonstrated/tested devices (not Rossi’s forward-looking statements which predate the actual developments).

  • Alan DeAngelis

    The people who slandered cold fusion/LENR for a quarter of a century will rename it and will claim credit for it as a new discovery of their own (and get funding for it).
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htgV7fNO-2k 26:15

    • Alan DeAngelis

      pardon me. i just wanted to add the link.

      • we want LENR Fusione Fredda

        I had the same result in another thread, wanted to add the link and the picture was posted.

        I fear that you might be right about slanderers changing colours.

        When there will be no more way to crush, insult, ridicule and deny, as the wind turns, they’ll haste to say “I knew it all along, in fact I told you so!” Historical memory and objectivity lost by the gullible public, they will shamelessly be interviewed left and right.

        • artefact

          I think Frank allowed embedding of videos for the composit stream of the first dog bone test.

        • bachcole

          We need to be there WITH evidence to set the record straight.

      • BroKeeper

        It is good to revisit this video periodically. Reminds us like the Phoenix arising out of the ashes to a greater destiny. So will Pons and Fleischmann.

      • we want LENR Fusione Fredda

        ENEA’s Rapporto 41 on CF by Giuliano Preparata, Emilio Del Giudice, Antonella DeNinno (http://www.nexusedizioni.it/it/CT/chi-ha-paura-della-fusione-fredda-di-antonella-de-ninno-533b2c0e01a92), Antonio Frattolillo, Antonietta Rizzo (the latter three appear to still be with ENEA), which confirmed the production of 4He and excess heat, was killed and hushed in 2002.
        http://www.rainews.it/ran24/inchieste/19102006_rapporto41.asp.
        Rubbia, left ENEA presidency for Spain in 2005, ousted by the “nominations” (power grabbing appointments) imposed by the Berlusconi government.
        Recently interviewed, Professor Rubbia appears to support shale gas as the energy source of the future http://espresso.repubblica.it/plus/articoli/2014/11/24/news/risorse-energetiche-la-versione-di-carlo-rubbia-1.189020.

  • tlp

    Mills Sun Cell is getting ready soon:
    Randy Mills today: “I don’t see any show stoppers with all components invented and working”

    • BroKeeper

      I hope so this time.

  • Albert D. Kallal

    Until a working product is delivered, then I think we will continue to see a “steady” increase in awareness. The last 6 months has been really good and kind for LENR

    I think one of the “most” important events was the 60 minutes piece “cold fusion is hot again”. There really not much “more” one can ask for then that video. That video spared interest in LENR likely more then any event of the past 5 years. (in fact quite sure it sparked Beryllium into action). That video is now 5 years old?

    The third party report was great, but until a credible industrial company starts delivering products, then LENR will continue its “current” steady progress.

    The largest “spark” on this cold fire so to speak?

    The MMFP project if successful in next few months also will spur HUGE interest. Assuming MMFP project replicates excess heat, this means LENR is EASY to achieve. This result would thus spur interests and replications around the world by universities and hobbyists. As examples of replications flourish then the beaten up door of resistance will become so weak and will collapse and fall down in a SPECTACULAR way.

    The science community will thus with egg on their face not only will accept LENR, but be tasked to explain how LENR works.

    So success via MMFP will do MORE to spur LENR between the time that the “turtles” and “rabbits” in this race get a product out the door. And failure of MMFP to produce heat of course will do the reverse!

    So if MMFP succeeds, then replications will follow. Note that the “key” concept here is not that MMFP achieves success, but the resulting replications are going to be the knockout punch we all been waiting for.

    Regards,
    Albert D. Kallal
    Edmonton, Alberta Canada
    [email protected]

  • Gerrit

    My prediction for 2015 is that the interest in LENR will continue to increase. 🙂

    Apart from a possible Bill Gates LENR announcement, I do not think that we will see a huge “eureka” news brouhaha. We have seen several quality news outlets cover the LENR topic fairly in 2014 and this trend will continue in 2015. Less crappy articles, more valuable articles.

    Industrial Heat will, by the end of 2015, inform us that the 1MW plant has been running for many months without issues, that the undisclosed customer is satisfied but will remain undisclosed and they will not substantiate these claim. No 1MW plant visits in 2015.

    The science world is already aware of LENR and, mostly passively, following the story.

    The two main events could be if MFMP succeeds in replication and if Bill Gates announces funding.

  • I follow the vision of Kuhn and Feyerabend, and the one of our sad experiences with 25 years of replications and a long list of more or less independent test.

    there cannot be any replication.

    any replication will be judged as a fraud, an error, an artifact, a non scientific test, a non replication, an unknown result. I invent nothing, this is just what I currently hear about TPR1/2 and Parkhjomov and alike…

    this is hopeless. the skeptics, which include academic authorities, media, scientific media, will NEVER acknowledge LENR without an authority which quive the imprimatur. POINT !

    since they are the authority that can give the imprimatur on the scientific side, it is hopeless.

    the solution is if the imprimatur came from big money from non state, non academic, non consensual, science…. it means evil market making dirty money.

  • Kevin O

    My prediction is that Rossi will challenge the USPTO rejection of his patent by using the TIP reports. The Patent office will still reject his claim. He and IH will put up a big stink in the press, rope in a few congresscritters and other influencers. But he won’t be able to get the USPTO to bend until 2016 when he will be forced to give public demos for the patent examiners with fraudbusters like James Randi invited to have a look. Up until now, his demos were for attracting investors. For 2015 it will be to a higher standard for the USPTO. It is possible that someone else like Brullion will beat him to the punch.

    I also predict that MFMP replication results will not be accepted by mainstream science until they go back to their gamma ray results.
    http://www.e-catworld.com/2013/11/07/mfmp-report-detection-of-unusual-gamma-rays/

  • ecatworld

    What kind of product are you referring to, Paul?

    Thanks!

    • Paul Maher

      I do not know, my source could not and did not share the particulars.  But whatever and whoever it is I’d love to be on their sales force. Paul
      From: Disqus
      To: [email protected]
      Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 3:30 AM
      Subject: Re: Comment on Your 2015 LENR Predictions

      #yiv4538021380 #yiv4538021380 a:hover, #yiv4538021380 a:hover span {color:#1188d2!important;}#yiv4538021380 .yiv4538021380button-cta:hover {color:#ffffff!important;background-color:#1188d2!important;}#yiv4538021380 .yiv4538021380button-cta:hover span {color:#ffffff!important;}#yiv4538021380 #yiv4538021380 #yiv4538021380 #yiv4538021380outlook a {padding:0;}#yiv4538021380 body {width:100% !important;}#yiv4538021380 .yiv4538021380ReadMsgBody {width:100%;}#yiv4538021380 .yiv4538021380ExternalClass {width:100%;display:block;}#yiv4538021380 _filtered #yiv4538021380 {}#yiv4538021380 .yiv4538021380content {width:100%;}#yiv4538021380 table {border-collapse:collapse;}#yiv4538021380 h2.yiv4538021380headline {font-weight:700;font-size:20px!important;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv4538021380 .yiv4538021380button-cta {display:block!important;padding:0!important;}#yiv4538021380 div.yiv4538021380header {padding-top:20px;}#yiv4538021380 div.yiv4538021380footer {padding-bottom:20px;}#yiv4538021380 #yiv4538021380 #yiv4538021380 p.yiv4538021380mod-tools a:hover {color:white!important;background:#8c989f!important;}#yiv4538021380 _filtered #yiv4538021380 {}#yiv4538021380 td.yiv4538021380avatar img, #yiv4538021380 td.yiv4538021380spacer img {width:28px!important;}#yiv4538021380 “What kind of product are you referring to, Paul?Thanks!” | |
      | |  Settings | |
      |   |

      | |

      | |
      |
      A new comment was posted on E-Cat World
      |
      | |
      |
      | |
      ecatworld
      What kind of product are you referring to, Paul?Thanks! 6:30 a.m., Wednesday Jan. 14 | Other comments by ecatworld |   |
      |
      |   | Reply to ecatworld |   |

      |
      |   |

      |

      | ecatworld’s comment is in reply to Paul Maher: |
      |   |
      | | I have it on extraordinarily good authority that product will be released in March or April, and that the reality of the situation will be …Read more |
      |
      | |

      | |

      | |
      | You’re receiving this message because you’re signed up to receive notifications about replies to paulmaher. You can unsubscribe from emails about replies to paulmaher by replying to this email with “unsubscribe” or reduce the rate with which these emails are sent by adjusting your notification settings. | | |

      | |

  • EEStorFanFibb

    products made by what company?

    • Paul Maher

      I’m sorry butI am not at liberty to say anything beyond that which I have said. Paul

      From: Disqus
      To: [email protected]
      Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 7:42 AM
      Subject: Re: Comment on Your 2015 LENR Predictions

      #yiv7304279128 #yiv7304279128 a:hover, #yiv7304279128 a:hover span {color:#1188d2!important;}#yiv7304279128 .yiv7304279128button-cta:hover {color:#ffffff!important;background-color:#1188d2!important;}#yiv7304279128 .yiv7304279128button-cta:hover span {color:#ffffff!important;}#yiv7304279128 #yiv7304279128 #yiv7304279128 #yiv7304279128outlook a {padding:0;}#yiv7304279128 body {width:100% !important;}#yiv7304279128 .yiv7304279128ReadMsgBody {width:100%;}#yiv7304279128 .yiv7304279128ExternalClass {width:100%;display:block;}#yiv7304279128 _filtered #yiv7304279128 {}#yiv7304279128 .yiv7304279128content {width:100%;}#yiv7304279128 table {border-collapse:collapse;}#yiv7304279128 h2.yiv7304279128headline {font-weight:700;font-size:20px!important;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv7304279128 .yiv7304279128button-cta {display:block!important;padding:0!important;}#yiv7304279128 div.yiv7304279128header {padding-top:20px;}#yiv7304279128 div.yiv7304279128footer {padding-bottom:20px;}#yiv7304279128 #yiv7304279128 #yiv7304279128 p.yiv7304279128mod-tools a:hover {color:white!important;background:#8c989f!important;}#yiv7304279128 _filtered #yiv7304279128 {}#yiv7304279128 td.yiv7304279128avatar img, #yiv7304279128 td.yiv7304279128spacer img {width:28px!important;}#yiv7304279128 “products made by what company?” | |
      | |  Settings | |
      |   |

      | |

      | |
      |
      A new comment was posted on E-Cat World
      |
      | |
      |
      | |
      EEStorFanFibb
      products made by what company? 10:42 a.m., Wednesday Jan. 14 | Other comments by EEStorFanFibb |   |
      |
      |   | Reply to EEStorFanFibb |   |

      |
      |   |

      |

      | EEStorFanFibb’s comment is in reply to Paul Maher: |
      |   |
      | | My prediction is that I go back to work selling LENR devices by the end of the year.Read more |
      |
      | |

      | |

      | |
      | You’re receiving this message because you’re signed up to receive notifications about replies to paulmaher. You can unsubscribe from emails about replies to paulmaher by replying to this email with “unsubscribe” or reduce the rate with which these emails are sent by adjusting your notification settings. | | |

      | |

      • EEStorFanFibb

        For someone who wants to keep secrets it seems strange that you just blasted your email addy out to perhaps 100s of people.

        • Paul Maher

          I guess I should get straight with you, I am not a physicist, just a reporter of what I have seen posted online.  What technical experience I have all relates to me having been a radar technician in the USAF, and a following career in the Military Microwave Electronics Industry as a technician and later as a Vendor Quality Assurance Rep. for Lockheed.
          All that I really want to see is Dr. Joseph Zawodnys Mantra, “Drain The Swamps, And Flood The Fields” bear fruit.
          This product could be coming from any number of directions.  You all know the names of the possible companies.Who knows, it could be a ZPE machine from NASA!! May The Weak Force Be With Us ALL,Paul D. Maherwww.coldfusionnow.org From: Disqus
          To: [email protected]
          Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 1:05 PM
          Subject: Re: Comment on Your 2015 LENR Predictions

          #yiv5251255297 #yiv5251255297 a:hover, #yiv5251255297 a:hover span {color:#1188d2!important;}#yiv5251255297 .yiv5251255297button-cta:hover {color:#ffffff!important;background-color:#1188d2!important;}#yiv5251255297 .yiv5251255297button-cta:hover span {color:#ffffff!important;}#yiv5251255297 #yiv5251255297 #yiv5251255297 #yiv5251255297outlook a {padding:0;}#yiv5251255297 body {width:100% !important;}#yiv5251255297 .yiv5251255297ReadMsgBody {width:100%;}#yiv5251255297 .yiv5251255297ExternalClass {width:100%;display:block;}#yiv5251255297 _filtered #yiv5251255297 {}#yiv5251255297 .yiv5251255297content {width:100%;}#yiv5251255297 table {border-collapse:collapse;}#yiv5251255297 h2.yiv5251255297headline {font-weight:700;font-size:20px!important;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv5251255297 .yiv5251255297button-cta {display:block!important;padding:0!important;}#yiv5251255297 div.yiv5251255297header {padding-top:20px;}#yiv5251255297 div.yiv5251255297footer {padding-bottom:20px;}#yiv5251255297 #yiv5251255297 #yiv5251255297 p.yiv5251255297mod-tools a:hover {color:white!important;background:#8c989f!important;}#yiv5251255297 _filtered #yiv5251255297 {}#yiv5251255297 td.yiv5251255297avatar img, #yiv5251255297 td.yiv5251255297spacer img {width:28px!important;}#yiv5251255297 “For someone who wants to keep secrets it seems strange that you just blasted your email addy out to perhaps 100s of people.” | |
          | |  Settings | |
          |   |

          | |

          | |
          |
          A new comment was posted on E-Cat World
          |
          | |
          |
          | |
          EEStorFanFibb
          For someone who wants to keep secrets it seems strange that you just blasted your email addy out to perhaps 100s of people. 4:05 p.m., Wednesday Jan. 14 | Other comments by EEStorFanFibb |   |
          |
          |   | Reply to EEStorFanFibb |   |

          |
          |   |

          |

          | EEStorFanFibb’s comment is in reply to Paul Maher: |
          |   |
          | | I’m sorry butI am not at liberty to say anything beyond that which I have said. PaulFrom: Disqus To: pmaher_art …Read more |

          |
          | |

          | |

          | |
          | You’re receiving this message because you’re signed up to receive notifications about replies to paulmaher. You can unsubscribe from emails about replies to paulmaher by replying to this email with “unsubscribe” or reduce the rate with which these emails are sent by adjusting your notification settings. | | |

          | |