Plasmonics With a Twist: Taming Optical Tornadoes on the Nanoscale (Axil Axil)

The following post was submitted by Axil Axil

Plasmonics with a twist: taming optical tornadoes on the nanoscale

Nanoplasmonics provide many types of EMF amplification mechanisms. One of the more difficult mechanisms to understand is how a pile of nano and micro particles greatly amplify EMF. The reference provided in this post shows how the topology in the way particles aggregate explain how EMF is concentrated through vortex formation. The reference defines an analogy between a vortex and a gear. Like a funnel, a large particle gathers the energy from a wave of EMF far larger than its diameter, In the case of the Rossi system, this type particle is the 5 micron nickel particle.

This large particle produces a relatively huge vortex. Other particles of various sizes accumulate around the nickel particle. Each of these particles produce a vortex proportional to the size of the particle. These vortexes fit together like gears where the large vortex provides a large amount of power, and the other smaller vortexes provide a gear train that speeds up the rotation rate of the smaller gears down the train.

Finally, the smallest vortexes associated with hydrogen crystals, spin at high rates of speed providing large EMF power amplification.

The take away is that a large spread of particles sizes produced within an aggregation of particles generates the most powerful EMF amplification effects. This fact explaines why the “secret sauce” effect provides such a large EMF power amplification result. These alkali metal hydrides supply the intermediatly sized gears that allows the large nickel gears to transfer their vast store of energy with little loss to the smallest hydrogen based gears down a smoothly running vortex power transmission chain.

I venture to say that there is randomness associated with this particle aggregation process that enables a sort of natural selection where the most effective dust pile configurations provide the most EMF amplification. When there are an abundance of particles, the chances are good that some of these piles will be LENR capable. That is to say, when there are a large number of particles, the chances are good that some of their aggregates will produce EMF amplication great enough to catalyze nuclear effects.

There is also a certain lifetime associated with particle formation. Particle piles are constanly falling apart. These particle aggregates must be constantly rebuilt to maintain a sustained reaction rate.

Axil Axil

  • Mats002

    Nice! I see lots of water-bubbles-in-space working in collective behavior.

  • f sedei

    Axil: It sounds like you are explaining the functioning in the “magic” of the magic sauce. Correct?

    • Axil Axil

      Yes…among other things.

  • Axil Axil

    Yogendra Srivastava explains the latest version of the Widom-Larsen Theory. At 13:30, the energy coming from the environment of the nanoparticles is guided along the surface of the nanoparticles and form a resonance on their surface.

    This resonance is transferred and trapped in a conductor isolated but very near the nanoparticules.

    These elementary currents added to each other form the big current at the output of the device.

    W & L theory as been moving toward the nanoplasmonic theory of the LENR reaction for some time now. It looks like they are mostly there.

    • @axilaxil:disqus

      Longview at LENR Forum has some interesting thoughts you may be interested in:

      I don’t understand much of physics, but maybe it’s interesting for you 🙂

      • Axil Axil

        The thread you referenced is about where electrons get their energy. The electrons gain energy from the nanoparticles. These particles act as dipole antennas which receive power from the heat produced by the heater. The heat is transformed by the electrons in a special way that I will get into in another post in the near future.

        As a preview, this paper covers the subject

        Extraordinary momentum and spin in evanescent waves

  • Mats002

    My understanding: the Rossi/Parkhomov secret sauce is an alkali metal like lithium or potassium: an element with a low vaporization point that first vaporizes and then re-condenses into Rydberg matter after each input heat pulse. These nanoparticles will eventually sinter but will always be renewed to provide a constant resupply of fresh nanopowder in a dynamic process.

    The size and other properties of Nickel (except that there are a few isotopes not working) is not of critical importance because Parkhomov used very diversed Nickel powder sizes where MFMP in earlier attempts used a Nickel powder with mostly small grain size with little variance. Piantelli used solid Nickel rods.

    Piantelli patent EP2368252B1 at paragraph 0039 about the process:

    “Alternatively, the process of depositing [the transition metal] can be performed by means of an epitaxial deposition, in which the deposit attains a crystalline structure that is similar to the structure of the substrate, thus allowing the control of such parameters.”

    My understanding: The 10% of Li[AlH4] used by Parkhomov is [the transition metal] which because of input heat will evaporate and form small nano-clusters on to the substrate which is the Nickel micropowder grains.

    More from Piantelli patent EP2368252B1 at paragraph 0016 about what is happening next:

    “The micro/nanometric clusters structure is a requirement for producing H- ions and for the above cited orbital and nuclear capture processes.”

    If Nickel grain size matters, why is Parkhomov successful with the described variance? The goal is to form NAE:s which is much smaller than the Nickel grains.

    And we know that H-atoms comes from the evaporated Li[AlH4] because there is no other source of H in this setup.

    The rest should be about plain engineering, fine tuning the parameters. And control which is another story.

    • Mats002

      ECW is full of information about this process, here is about triggering the effect (startup) from September 28, 2012, but at that time so much less was known in the open, revisiting this information might give more light: Paper from EPRI

      Page 12: “Continued tests with multiple thermal cycles are indicated. The triggering effects of thermal cycling have been observed, but are not yet understood. Piantelli [16], for example, employs multiplethermal cycles over days and weeks to initiate heat release. It is believed that these cycles introduce nanoscale surface features that have an increased activity.”

      The AC/chopped curve might be needed for input heat pulsing and this document also state that a minimum temperature must be reached to start the effect. I hope we will soon know, MFMP have been first hand educated by both Piantelli and Parkhomov.