Optical Communication on a Chip: LENR Application? (Axil Axil)

The following post was submitted by Axil Axil

Regarding: With thanks to Jones Beene who sent this paper and thinks it can be applied -in some way- to LENR:

Jones’s idea as follows:

“This is an advanced technology for communications using SPP, but can a similar technology be used to drive the LENR reaction?


This assumes that the Ni-H reaction, or one variety thereof, responds to an optoelectronic pulse. Combine the SPP driver with a TEG converter, and the iPhone makes its own power. Apple may realize the connection, even at an early stage.

Very exciting situation if the big chip companies should get involved, and why not – with Tesla motors situated across the bay?”

Jones’ concept is strong and true in that LENR is not bound to any element like hydrogen or topology like cracks. Engineering can meet and express the fundamental requirements of LENR design if the basic causes of LENR are understood.

The SPP behavior that has not yet been recognized by plasmonic science is the ability of SPPs to produce a positive feedback loop that compensates for the energy losses due to diffusion through the offsetting gains produced by non linear energy production. This ability to amplify the chemistry based catalytic activity of SPPs is not yet in the province of plasmonic research. When nano-particles setup the SPP to amplify their power and force SPP wave forms to loop onto themselves in a vortex, it produces a short lived “Dark Mode” configuration that acts just like a celestial black hole that draws energy into itself from its surroundings. This ability to attract, concentrate and store new energy involves at least two distinct although related mechanisms.

First, SPPs concentrate and reorient the spin of photons then project the magnetic single pole beam so formed from one of the poles of the vortex. This beam both destabilizes and then transports energy from the affected matter back along the path of the beam through the action of quantum teleportation. This mechanism can act at a considerable distance away from the vortex. Next, the SPP soliton can share, transfer and accumulate energy through quantum mechanical entanglement with clusters of matter of arbitrary size. This instantaneous gleaning of energy from many distinct sources occurs within a spherical zone around the vortex. This duality of causation in the results observed in the LENR reaction leads to understandable confusion. But this multiplicity in the results as produced by the fundamental cause of LENR are unified by a commonality of characteristics linked to a common origin of the effect..

These common and universal conditions include the thermalization of gamma radiation, the rapid to instantaneous stabilization of radioactive isotopes, lack of neutron emissions, and the wide variation of seemingly random transmutation results which includes fusion of light elements into heavier elements and fission of heavy elements into lighter ones, remote reaction at a distance from the location of the LENR reaction, and instantaneous cluster fusion involving huge numbers of sub-reactions that occur instantly and collectively.

Even though the LENR reaction oftentimes occurs concurrent with the presence of hydrogen isotopes, hydrogen in not required as a fundamental cause of the reaction as shown in the experiments done at Proton 21 where a ball of copper is blasted with a high powered arc discharge, and the carbon dust experiments performed using microwaves conducted by George Egely, the new editor of infinite magazine. In the Proton 21 experiments in nano-particles involved are copper based and in the Egely case the nano-particles are based on carbon. In the Papp reaction. The nano particles are based on chlorine and noble gases.

LENR has made itself known in our world ever since the days of young Tesla when electricity has be made powerful enough to generate nano particles from matter. Since we have brought Egely’s name up, Egely has written a wonderful series of articles explaining how SPPs have produced LENR for over a century in many diverse and now long forgotten systems going back to the times and work by Tesla. They are well worth a read and as follows:


Axil Axil

  • georgehants

    Axil, so much unknown and the Quantum guys can enjoy that Wonderful feeling of excitement and wonder by freely Researching the Quantum reality free of established Dogma.
    They, I think, except that nobody “knows” and just sail along looking for answers and as we see from many reports, new effects are turning up all the time.
    Of course Cold Fusion is Quantum, as everything is at base Quantum and hopefully before long something will be found that points to what lies beneath the Quantum.
    What is the creator can be the only question to ask and all guesses are perfectly valid at this time.

    • Axil Axil

      To the best of my knowledge, no one has figured out how a catalyst increases the speed of a chemical reaction. It seems to me that LENR is catalytic action in maximum overdrive. Their is also indications that the physics of collective electron interactions and light interactions with matter are at the center of the LENR reaction.

      Quantum electrodynamics, commonly referred to as QED, is a quantum field theory of the electromagnetic force. This field was created recently by physicists including Sin-Itiro Tomonaga, Julian Schwinger and Richard Feynman who were jointly awarded with a Nobel prize in physics in 1965 for their work in this area.

      LENR may control the speed at which time advances because it has been shown that LENR increases both the speed of chemical reactions as happens when no amplification is applied to the catalytic base by additives(nano particles) and the rate at which radioactive decay progresses with the additions of additives. Because of this ability to manipulate time, LENR might connect general relativity to quantum mechanics (QED), one of the major objectives that physics is now heavily invested in.

      What a marvelous opportunity that LENR can afford science. LENR has the capability to allow humankind to look deeply into jf not directly at the root of the structure of the universe and provide a desktop or even a chip based research platform for the cosmic questions that are now are emerging in physics and cosmology.

      • georgehants

        Axil many thanks, such Wonderful science, open, honest, where everybody can put up freely their ideas and others can learn and communicate freely.
        The answers will come quickly from such True science, that has been suppressed for many years.
        Hopefully soon all science will be communicated as you do, on fairly moderated Websites like this, not by political, ego and financially motivated journals etc. where corrupted peer review destroys the ideas that are not exceptable to the scientific priests.
        Good luck with your work that is a pleasure to read.

  • Dave Lawton

    Having worked at the cutting edge of experimental high energy particle physics in the 60`s
    and 70`s I find the youtube vid of George Egely nano dust fusion experiment taking the piss.
    A high proportion of pencil leads are magnetic. If you watch the vid he tests the powder
    for magnetism but not the pencil led. Its a stage magicians trick. This is not
    experimental physics.

  • Hi all

    Hagelstein and Mitchell Schwartz of the MIT team will be the ones to take advantage of this quickest.

    Kind Regards walker

  • James Andrew Rovnak

    Still think time varying reversing B fields of heating coil is key to Rossi replication & SPP site initiation, growth, & decay with proper power pulse width modulated inputs the controlling factor leading to Rossi type (ssm) LENR & his commercial version he is currently testing out with a customer. Rossi is the mouse leading the Cats progress both up/down & holding power levels in the 700 to 1500 C power generation range. .Axil’s article’s lend insite into this possiblity & thanks for your tireless efforts to educate us all Axil! Just sometimes we do have a little different take! Also believe the TRIAC multi frequency content source is key to control of LENR process working on development of areas of LENRs presence within the fuel element & 4th power thermal loss to enfvronment is a regulating force also. Would like to see current shutdown MFMP fuel element powered up again with an electronic circuit to provide full current reversals thru fuel element coil to see if observable (ssm) LENR could be established at least around 800 to 900 C as Rossi & Parkhomov claim & provide some evidence for. Note they both employ TRIAC sources with reversing currents to their heating coils.

    • Axil Axil

      The goal is to create nano-particles. The rust doped with potassium seems like a tried and true way to do this. I would also include the lithium aluminum hydride additive.

  • Axil Axil

    With the detection of muons in fusion processes related to Rydberg matter reported by Leif Holmlid, I wonder if the tracks reported in the cloud chamber experiments of Dr. Piantelli were actually tracks produced by muons of the appropriate enemy levels rather than tracks produced by protons?

  • Axil Axil

    Leif Holmlid states that the production of Muons in the nuclear reactions catalyzed by the fundamental cause of LENR are not caused by the fusion of deuterium. The fundamental LENR cause resides inside the Rydberg matter as explained in the SPP theory.

    “In this discussion, it is excluded that the muons are formed from the fusion energy, but it is clear that they are formed from nuclear and decay processes starting in the D(0). “

  • Da Phys

    Axil, LENR relies on collective oscillations and in turn interactions between particles or quasi-particles, this is something that we can take for granted in LENR. However, what I don’t like in SPP theory is the assumption, almost by definition, that these collective oscillations happen on a plasma layer on top of a metal surface. As far as I know, we don’t have solid evidence that LENR is surface-wave effect (read 2D effect). On the other hand, the simple fact that a high “loading” is required in Ni-H and Pd-D crystal lattices suggest that the phenomenon is 3D. In my opinion, lattice-waves in 3D crystals represent a simple and more realistic solution to LENR than the more complex SPP.

    • Axil Axil

      The production of SPPs has been experimentally verified to be produced by a surface effect related to the skin effect characterized in AC current. LERN is caused by light converted by the optical effects at the SURFACE of a metal where the index of refraction is important…metal reflects light.


      Note:”The RIKEN team analysed the momentum and spin of evanescent electromagnetic waves – a type of light waves that travel close to the surface of material objects and whose intensity decreases exponentially, rather than varying sinusoidally, from the interface where they were formed.”

      High loading in LENR is caused by the production of Rydberg nano particles. These are required to produce powerful SPPs.

      • Da Phys

        Yes the production of SPPs has been experimentally verified but not the fact that LENR has SPPs at its roots. What evidence do you have? How SPPs can favour fusion?

        With regard to high loading, your sentence does not make any sense. High loading “may be required” for the production of nano-particles, however it cannot be “caused by”. On the other hand, it is well known that high loading of atoms of small size in a lattice made of atoms of large size can lead to resonant phonons.

        • Axil Axil

          How does your ideas explain LENR in cavitation?