New Nickel-Hydrogen Excess Heat Claim With Celani-type Cell (Video)

Here’s a new name and a new experiment for us to consider. This comes from Russia from an experimenter named¬†Andrei Hrischanovich who published the following information today, September 6, 2015, on the Russian Cold Nuclear Fusion and Transmutation website here. Following is a Google translation (edited).

Andrei Hrischanovich repeated the experiment with a Celani cell.

We conducted a series of experiments, of a modified Rossi reactor. The experiments are more like a Francesco Celani cell. Reached consistently reproduced by using hydrogen, the result of excessive heat generation at the level of 200-250%. Rechecked. Doubt no more! LENR reactions occur! It is seen that with an increase in temperature and pressure in the reaction zone, the efficiency increases. Perhaps in Dagomys on September 28 to make a report. Now I decide the financial and organizational issues for attending conferences. Sincerely, Andrew Hrischanovich.

Below is a video of the experiment with English subtitles. The video information states (Google translated):

Published on Sep 6, 2015
We have changed the basic experiment A. Rossi. We do not nickel powder is heated and passed an electric current on the nickel wire. It is known that the thermal conductivity of hydrogen is 7 times greater than the thermal conductivity of air. Considering this factor, we performed control experiments on the heating of water. It is shown that, other things being equal, there is an atmosphere of hydrogen stable excess heat capacity at the level of efficiency of 200-250%. Also possible pressure relationships which affect efficiency, such as chemical activation of the surface coil, the surface area (diameter of the wire), the material spirals tungsten, titanium, nickel, molybdenum and others.

Our site: http://tet.in.ua

  • Bob Matulis

    The more replications the better. At some point we will reach a tipping point where the scientific community will have no choice but to pursue LENR.

  • Bob Matulis

    The more replications the better. At some point we will reach a tipping point where the scientific community will have no choice but to pursue LENR.

  • pelgrim108

    Can the experimenter bring the first experiment back to cop 1 by using a LENR inactive heating wire in this same pressured hydrogen?
    How much of this effect can be explained by focusing available energy into heating water?
    Many thanks to the experimenter for the experiments and the english subtitles.

  • pelgrim108

    Can the experimenter bring the first experiment back to cop 1 by using a LENR inactive heating wire in this same pressured hydrogen?
    How much of this effect can be explained by focusing available energy into heating water?
    Many thanks to the experimenter for the experiments and the english subtitles.

  • Freethinker

    I commented on this in lenr-forum. Copy.ome observations:

    The first part of the clip. The temperature gradient for the hydrogen case is seen to be about 1C/s, in two different sub clips(370-391C; t=22s and 398-415C; 16s duration). For the oxygen case the gradient is >2C/s (253-202C;t=23s). I just wonder if the thermal load (the running water) is same, or if the oxygen case if farther away from the equilibrium than the hydrogen case is. Or put differently: Is the comparison reasonable? Also, The power diff seem to be ~5W between the two cases, lower for the oxygen case.

    Further

    @ 6:20 in to the video the power is turned off, the temperature meter is blank, but the temperature is “high”, and then there is a pressure drop, due to “sorption of hydrogen in titanium hydride”. Well, to me the pressure drop is due to the rapid cooling of the tube, the pressure going down according to the general gas law. Or?

    Otherwise a cool setup and cool video. Wish them the best of luck with it.

  • bachcole

    It is really difficult to follow the Russian translation, but I did get the direction that they are going in: REPLICATION

  • Adriano Bassignana

    I have serious doubts that the phenomenon is real.

    The experimental setup, runs a test on water flow with air and then with H2, in this condition the wire is very bright in the air, obviously because the greater thermal insulation (the air is much more thermally insulating than hydrogen) It makes hotter the wire. While, in hydrogen, the wire is colder, as the hydrogen is much more thermally conductive and transfers more heat to the wall of quartz which is obviously more hot. The experimenter clearly confirms this fact by noting the doubling of the outside temperature quartz. This is logical, as the thermal conduction of hydrogen is much higher than that of air and the result is coherent and the nickel wire, hence the wire is more red, ie its light emission has a greater wavelength .

    So it can not say anything with the simple measurement of the outer surface of the quartz tube, should make a calibration into helium, then you can say something more correct.

    For the test with the flow water pose serious doubts whether the investigator, first, do not insert a converter I / R outside of the quartz tube, for example, can build a converter with a tube made of refractory material or metal such as stainless .

    Or anything that allows photons thermal wavelength longer being absorbed (and subsequently re-emitted at much lower frequency or by thermal conduction) before crossing the water and then exit from the transparent container.

    The water is transparent to the radiation blue-green, that which is present at the highest temperature of the nickel wire in the air! But at that frequency the water absorbs less (as explained above), and then the water heats less because the device gives less heat to it!

    Instead, when there is the hydrogen, the temperature of the exterior of the quartz tube is higher, but the part of emissive (nickel wire) is colder (red color of the nickel wire, as is clearly seen from the movie! ). In these conditions the water is “heated” in a more efficient, since the quartz tube exterior is actually hotter (.. he says so, that in that case the quartz tube is surrounded of vapor bubbles …) and the thermal emitted photons have a greater wavelength which is better absorbed by water.

    Thus special I believe that the experiment does not allow to say anything if the experimenter before it further refines the device, ensuring the full absorption of thermal photons outside of the quartz tube.

  • David Nygren
  • David Nygren