New Piantelli European Patent Granted

Thanks to the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project for bringing attention to a patent published for an invention of Francesco Piantelli titled “Method and apparatus for generating energy by nuclear reactions of hydrogen adsorbed by orbital capture on a nanocrystalline structure of a metal”

Link is here: http://www.google.com/patents/EP2754156A2?cl=en

At the bottom of the page is a note that states: Jan 6, 2016 INTG Announcement of intention to grant,Effective date: 20151211

Here are the main claims:

1. A method for generating energy by nuclear reactions between hydrogen (31 ) and a transition metal, said method comprising the steps of:

– prearranging (1 10) a primary material (19) that comprises said transition metal;

bringing and keeping said hydrogen (31 ) into/in contact with said primary material (19);
heating (130) said primary material (19) up to an initial temperature (Ti) higher than a predetermined critical temperature;

producing an impulse (140) in said primary material (19), in order to cause a generation of H” ions (35) starting from said hydrogen (31 ), and to cause capture reactions (150, 151 ) of said H” ions (35) by said primary material (19) thus causing a generation of a thermal energy (q);

– removing (160) a thermal power (Q) deriving from said generated thermal energy (q), while maintaining the temperature of said primary material (19) above said critical temperature, characterised in that a step (200) is provided of increasing said H” ions (35) that are available for said capture reactions (150, 151 ), such that the concentration of said H- ions (35) changes from a first concentration value to a second concentration value in said hydrogen (31 ) which is in contact with said primary material (19), and such that the rate of said capture reactions (150,151 ) increases and, accordingly, said generation of thermal energy (q) increases up to an increased thermal energy.

Later on in the patent application it refers to an “energy generator wherein said ionization means comprises a means for supplying an energy vector to said hydrogen”. These are some means listed.

– a ionizing radiation selected from the group comprised of: a radiofrequency, in particular microwaves; a light radiation; a uV waves; a X – radiation; an a – radiation; a β – radiation; a y – radiation; a combination of the above radiations;
– a beam of particles selected from the group comprised of: protons; hyperons; mesons; leptons; metal ions; a combination of the above particles;

The patent was originally filed on July 13, 2012, and has just now been made public apparently.

  • DrD

    Reason for rejection: “Violates the known laws of physics”.
    What’s the odds on that guess?

    • Argon

      Would you mind to elaborate more since I read fact:
      “The patent has been granted

      Database last updated on 16.04.2016”

      • DrD

        Apologies, I read it as only being the application nor had spotted that it was european which makes a difference.

  • DrD

    Reason for rejection: “Violates the known laws of physics”.
    What’s the odds on that guess?

    • Steve Swatman

      One day the known laws of physics will have a new chapter written… one day, sooner, rather than later.

      • DrD

        It happens; but on this occasion there’s a huge bunch of $ hanging on the “old” laws of physics, or should I say, “keeping them afloat”.

    • Argon

      Would you mind to elaborate more since I read fact:
      “The patent has been granted

      Database last updated on 16.04.2016”

      • DrD

        Apologies, I read it as only being the application nor had spotted that it was european which makes a difference.

  • Sanjeev

    This is the same patent which was revoked earlier because of a challenge by Rossi. It is now granted.
    I don’t exactly know what is going on here, but here is the info.
    Btw, this is a very important patent for replicators.

  • Sanjeev

    This is the same patent which was revoked earlier because of a challenge by Rossi. It is now granted.
    I don’t exactly know what is going on here, but here is the info.
    Btw, this is a very important patent for replicators.

  • Felix Meyer

    The patent is old (2012) from Piantelli,
    and the producing energy by transititon metal in form “nanocrystall structure” with hyydrogen.
    The is the basis of LENR … fine!

    • DrD

      I think it is? As this has been granted it could be a problem for AR. I wonder if he will comment (materially).
      I see a patent battle looming; only the lawyers will benefit.

      • Gerard McEk

        You are right. Where AR was not allowed to refer to any nuclear reaction, this does. I wonder how much they interfere with each other.

        • DrD

          It is quite long with many claims. I had a quick read and my impression is that it claims methods for improving the existing LENR (presumably AR’s patents but I didn’t check). If so, I think it needs a license from AR to use his IP but similarly, AR needs a license to use any of these methods (in europe). Or they fight it out. I may be commpletely wrong so perhaps some one more experienced in patent law can comment.

  • DrD

    I think it is? As this has been granted it could be a problem for AR. I wonder if he will comment (materially).
    I see a patent battle looming with only only the lawyers benefitting.

    • Gerard McEk

      You are right. Where AR was not allowed to refer to any nuclear reaction, this does. I wonder how much they interfere with each other.

      • DrD

        It is quite long with many claims. I had a quick read and my impression is that it claims methods for improving the existing LENR (presumably AR’s patents but I didn’t check). If so, I think it needs a license from AR to use his IP but similarly, AR needs a license to use any of these methods (in europe). Or they fight it out. I may be commpletely wrong so perhaps some one more experienced in patent law can comment.

    • greggoble

      The Responsibly Imaginable

      “Advanced-to-Revolutionary Space Technology Options – The Responsibly Imaginable” April 2013

      Dennis M. Bushnell, Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia
      http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20130011698.pdf

      Low Energy Nuclear Reactions, the Realism and the Outlook

      LENR could, by itself, COMPLETELY Revolutionize Space access and utilization. Although there is a quite long history of “anomalous” observations including transmutations the “recent” consideration of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions begins with the Pons/ Fleishman late 80’s observations and assertions regarding what they termed “Cold Fusion”. Subsequent difficulties with experimental replication and an utter lack of convincing theoretical explication forced research in this arena “underground” with minimal financial support.

      The current situation is that we now have over two decades of hundreds of experiments indicating heat and transmutations with minimal radiation and low energy input. By any rational measure this evidence indicates something real is occurring. So, is LENR “Real”? Evidently, from the now long standing and diverse experimental evidence – yes – With effects occurring using diverse materials, methods of energy addition etc.

      This is FAR from a “Narrow Band”/episodic set of physical phenomena.

      The next consideration is “WHAT IS REAL? WHAT IS Happening? For NASA Langley the epiphany moment on LENR was the publication of the Widom-Larsen weak interaction LENR Theory. This theory is currently under study and experimental verification [ or not] at NASA LaRC. The theory appears to explain nearly all the various and often variegated experimental observations and shifted the LENR Theoretical focus from some way of “fooling” Particle Nuclear Physics/The Strong Force to Condensed Matter Nuclear Physics, Collective Effects, The Weak Force and “Heavy Electrons”.

      The Strong Force Particle Physicists have of course evidently been correct all along, “Cold Fusion” is not possible. HOWEVER, via collective effects/condensed matter quantum nuclear physics LENR is allowable without any “Miracles”.

      The theory states that once load surfaces with hydrogen/protons and add some energy IF the surface morphology enables high localized voltage gradients then “heavy electrons leading to ultra low energy neutrons will form, neutrons that never leave the surface. The neutrons set up isotope cascades that results in beta decay and heat and transmutations with the heavy electrons converting the gamma from the beta decay into heat.

      The theory indicates several key issues/circumstances are required to enable-to-optimize LENR and explains the various experimental observations, including the often long initiation times required in some experiments. If the theory is experimentally validated in detail it provides the understanding to shift LENR research from discovery into engineering development.

      The theory indicates energy densities some million times chemical, the current experiments are in the 10’s to hundreds range. However, several labs have blown up studying LENR and windows have melted, indicating when the conditions are “right” prodigious amounts of energy can be released/produced. There are some 6 or so groups claiming device outputs in the 100 watt range and 3 others claiming kilowatts. Efforts are ongoing within NASA and other organizations to validate, or not, these claims. It should be noted that these devices are essentially “Edisonian,” the result of attempts at experimental “discovery” vice ab-initio design from the weak interaction theories per se.

      The LENR situation and outlook is therefore the following: Something real is happening, the weak interaction theories suggest what the physics might be, there are efforts ongoing to explore the validity of the theories, there are continuing Edisonian efforts to produce “devices,” mainly for heat or in some cases Transmutations. There are efforts to “certify” such devices.

      We are still FAR from the theoretical limits of the weak interaction physics and are in fact inventing in real time the requisite Engineering, along with verifying the physics. When we concentrated upon Nuclear Engineering beginning in the 1940’s we went, “jumped” to the strong force/particle physics and leapt over the weak force, condensed matter nuclear physics. We are going “back” now to study and hopefully develop this arena.

      The “Precautionary Principle” demands that we core down and determine realism for this arena, given the truly massive-to-mind boggling benefits – Solutions to climate, energy and the limitations that restrict the NASA Mission areas, all of them.

      The KEY to Space Exploration is Energetics. Some examples of what LENR might/ could enable in a resultant “Energy Rich” Exploration context include:

      – Refrigeration for Zero Boiloff cryo storage

      – Active Radiation protection

      – High Thrust Vasimir/MHD Propulsion

      – Energy Beaming

      – Separation of propulsive mass and energy/energetics to establish the requisite conductivity for most “harvested” propulsive mass including regolith

      – Planetary Terraforming

      – Ubiquitous in space and on-planet sensors and robotics

      – LEO propulsion – On planet power and energy

      – EDL retro via heating of ingested mass

      Also, The Key to SST’s and neighbor-friendly personal fly/drive air vehicles is Energetics, as simplex examples of the potential implications of this area of research. There are estimates using just the performance of some of the devices under study that one percent of the nickel mined on the planet each year could produce the world’s energy requirements at the order of 25 percent the cost of coal. No promises but something[s] seriously “strange” are going on, which we may be closer to understanding and if we can optimize/engineer such the world changes. Worldwide, worth far more resources than are currently being devoted to this research arena. Need to core down and determine “Truth”. If useful, need to engineer/apply.

      To Possibly Be

      Imaginable So Responsibly

      Creatively See
      Observational The Reality

      Hope of Theory
      Occupational A Visionary

      Energize Plea
      Survival With Planetary

      Space Faring
      Quantum LENR
      Energy
      gbgoble2013

      FARING : intransitive verb

      1. To get along
      2. To go or happen
      3. To travel; go.
      4. To dine; eat.

      Middle English faren, from Old English faran; akin to Old High German faran to go, Latin portare to carry, Greek peran to pass through, poros passage, journey.

      First Known Use: before 12th century

    • Alan DeAngelis

      No one would be granted a LENR patent now if Rossi had not gone from watt to kilowatts.

  • DrD

    It happens; but on this occasion there’s a huge bunch of $ hanging on the “old” laws of physics, or should I say, “keeping them afloat”.

  • clovis ray

    Ph f f f f f f’,
    Bob, better quiet, screwing around, or no one will believe anything you say,

  • roseland67

    Why the Rossi objection overturned?
    Why was it granted now?
    Was it replicated & shown to generate
    Excess heat?

  • Mats002

    This is a European patent (EPO), not US (USPTO). I guess that will make it harder to challange from US interests.

  • Mats002

    This is a European patent (EPO), not US (USPTO). I guess that will make it harder to challange from US interests.

  • GordonDocherty

    “New Piantelli European Patent Granted” – this is great news, especially as this Patent clearly describes an LENR system (and well deserved by Piantelli).

  • GordonDocherty

    “New Piantelli European Patent Granted” – this is great news, especially as this Patent clearly describes an LENR system (and well deserved by Piantelli).

    “Come senators, congressmen
    Please heed the call
    Don’t stand in the doorway
    Don’t block up the hall
    For he that gets hurt
    Will be he who has stalled
    There’s a battle outside
    And it is ragin’
    It’ll soon shake your windows
    And rattle your walls
    For the times they are a-changin’.”

    For anyone who might still be stalling, now’s the time to jump…

  • Barbierir

    Frank, there are new recent posts visible from mobile but they don’t appear when I visit the site by PC

  • Barbierir

    Frank, there are new recent posts visible from mobile but they don’t appear when I visit the site by PC

    • Frank Acland

      Can you say which posts?

      • Frank Acland

        I have added this permanent post for the lawsuit to the top right (under always open) and on the green menu bar: http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/04/18/rossileonardo-vs-industrial-heat-et-al-update-1-ih-using-jones-day-law-firm/

      • Barbierir

        april 16 – New Energy World Symposium Cancelled
        april 16 – Cold Fusion is news again
        april 16 – Cold Fusion: This time for real?
        april 16 – Ryan Hunt of MFMP to speak on LENR
        april 18 – Rossi/Leonardo vs Industrial Heat et al.

        The above I see from mobile but don’t appear from my computer

        • Frank Acland

          The links should be in the header, next to the logo

          • Barbierir

            Now I see them, I always look at the main page 🙂

  • radvar

    Is there anything new in here that would help replication?

    • Bob Greenyer

      Lots – much stuff he had not previously disclosed.

  • Ciaranjay

    I think if Rossi is going to do anything he needs to be quick. There are others in the game too.
    I fear he has missed the boat and spends too much time picking arguments with others.
    Tech like this needs a great inventor but also a great business brain and the ability to form beneficial alliances.

    • DrD

      Yes, perhaps he would have been better to atract less attention, taking a lower profile like his competitors. I think he’s still way out in the lead but he does need to get moving with that mass production. It concerns me his production capacity is still many days per E-Cat rather than many E-Cats per day with no ramp-up in sight.

  • Ciaranjay

    I think if Rossi is going to do anything he needs to be quick. There are others in the game too.
    I fear he has missed the boat and spends too much time picking arguments with others.
    Tech like this needs a great inventor but also a great business brain and the ability to form beneficial alliances.

    • DrD

      Yes, perhaps he would have been better to atract less attention, taking a lower profile like his competitors. I think he’s still way out in the lead but he does need to get moving with that mass production. It concerns me his production capacity is still many days per E-Cat rather than many E-Cats per day with no ramp-up in sight.

  • Rene

    This is a published patent application, not a granted patent. It has a priority date of 2011, right around or even before Rossi was describing his e-cat.
    Publication numberEP2754156 A2
    Publication typeApplicationApplication
    numberEP20120778404
    Publication date Jul 16, 2014 Filing date Jul 13, 2012 Priority date Jul 14, 2011
    Now that it has been published, the knives can come out and trim away the claims. This will require prior art disclosures or surfacing any earlier submarined applications. Finally, this is what will move things forward.

    • Monty

      So why does it say: “(Expected) grant” in the status of the patent on this page?
      https://register.epo.org/application?number=EP12778404&lng=en&tab=event

      • Rene

        expected means just that – to be granted at some point. I just checked again a few minutes ago and the status changed to granted. This now seriously interesting:
        https://register.epo.org/application?number=EP12778404

        • psi2u2

          So it was changed in between the two times you looked at it??

          That’s a little spooky.

          • Rene

            Not spooky, things change. Also my comments are moderated – no idea why, but it can take several hours before the queue gets released.

          • Alex Fenrick

            Rene…don’t you find it at least a little odd that a patent filed in 2012 appears to have changed the exact same time this circus is erupting in the exact same related field? Okay I will admit maybe this one is right on the skeptic edge lol…I dunno what do you think?

          • Rene

            I don’t find it odd since the only thing that seems to have changed is the status. That’s the normal process for patents.

          • Alex Fenrick

            You are right Rene….when I saw “Database last updated on 16.04.2016” I incorrectly assumed that meant an update for ONLY that record in the database…I believe it actually means the entire database (or section of database) was updated on that date.

          • psi2u2

            So you think it was just a coincidence? Still, sounds like things are moving fast now.

        • Alex Fenrick

          Definitely odd….especially considering the date….

          “The patent has been granted
          Database last updated on 16.04.2016”

  • Hugh Maguire

    He might as well have added Spanking and Yodelling to the means of supplying energy to the reactor. I have found that it’s typical of Piantelli’s patents to claim in his methods and materials not only what has been tried out, but also what might someday be tried out.

    • Bob Greenyer

      Both should work as they would create shock to stimulate anharmonic oscillations. However, he already has that in there.

    • mcloki

      I think that’s a matter of wording your patent as broadly as possible to stop infringers later on.

  • Mats002

    I tip my Piantelli Feodora hat for – Piantelli et al – Congratulations gentlemen!

    • Bob Greenyer

      He certainly deserves it!

      • Been there, Seen it

        I have just read Piantelli’s patent EP2754156 – three times from top to bottom. All you need to know is in there, obfuscated, as usual.

        At last the 1MW E-Cat operation (plus ERV and purchase of 3 more E-Cats by the same customer) has provided the EPO with the required proof of principle for this EP to be granted. Voila!

        • Bob Greenyer

          Yes, I hope to decode some of that in future videos to remove some of the obfuscation for other people – but it is good to see him finally add more details that he knew for instance the specific Hydrogen pressure range.

  • Bob Greenyer

    Note – this patent from Jun 21, 1989,

    http://google.com/patents/DE3920312A1?cl=en#legal-events

    which became open due to non-payment of fee, suggests the use of Th 227, Th228, Po210 and Am241

  • Bob Greenyer

    Note – this patent from Jun 21, 1989,

    http://google.com/patents/DE3920312A1?cl=en#legal-events

    which became open due to non-payment of fee, suggests the use of Th 227, Th228, Po210 and Am241

  • Bob Greenyer

    I had a thought, Stoyan Sarg suggested adding Sr90 to me two years ago and I talked about it publicaly – Sr90 is a near pure beta emitter – after visiting Parkhomov, I noted publicaly that Parkhomovs other main experiment in his house had Sr90 in it, he certainly could have added it as he had supply. Now we see Piantelli suggesting it in his patent.

    • psi2u2

      Very interesting. I keep thinking that you’all are putting this together now, and that the internet really does transform the possibilities for collaboration like this as ideas get shared in a forum dedicated the ideals of open source and open science.

      That is for me a very cool thing to watch and participate in.

    • Alan Smith

      Vlad Dubinko has suggested to me that Sr90 betas are too energetic at over 500keV – he thinks the action zone lies around 1-100keV. Carbon14 is a possible but I would be concerned about it’s potential release as CO2 and getting incorporated into something useful -like me. That puts Sm151 at 51keV with low toxicity bang in the frame from his perspective.

      • Bob Greenyer

        We have several offers from volunteers to build RF H2 ionisers and this is the ideal way, as shown in Piantelli’s patent.

    • Rene

      I think Am241 would help a lot since it puts out weak gammas, 59Kev and those could jiggle the lattice just right. I get the impression that there are many ways to jiggle LENR out of micro cavities. But then, I am quite happy one need not resort to bulk radioactive methods. Indeed that may be one of Rossi’s contribution to the field: excitation and quenching methods using non-radioactive means.

  • NCkhawk

    Piantelli is the father of Nickel Hydrogen cold fusion and this is a very appropriate move by the EPO. It is also very good news that he was finally able to defeat Rossi’s attack to invalidate this patent after an appeal to Munich. The correct decision was reached and Rossi has only managed to create additional prior art against himself.

  • NCkhawk

    Piantelli is the father of Nickel Hydrogen cold fusion and this is a very appropriate move by the EPO. It is also very good news that he was finally able to defeat Rossi’s attack to invalidate this patent after an appeal to Munich. The correct decision was reached and Rossi has only managed to create additional prior art against himself.

    • greggoble

      Rossi has heat but not a defensible patent. Get into the market now, so is his stated strategy. On and on with the lawsuits… a secondary consideration.

      Many LENR patents have been granted… and wrongfully denied.

      Who holds rights or claims over others?

  • PW

    As long as all of these things are not shared with the world (open sourced) I do not think it will be a gamechanger at all …
    So, again a patent, again protecting intellectual property? Where does it end? Like Rossi, in court?

  • Argon

    I have not seen this posted elsewhere. Etiam has decided to release new share issue in extraordinary general meeting. Not specific claims on LENR device but continued research on field.
    Link: http://www.etiam.fi/news.html (See Apr 15 posting)

    • greggoble

      simply put… Many labs are replicating… and improving the low energy nuclear reaction environment. There are private/corporate research groups that have enough money and resources to make you drool and cause your eyes to pop out in delight.

      Also, the thing about LENR nuclear energy…
      This is FAR from a “Narrow Band”/episodic set of physical phenomena.

      Edisonian methods will lead to a couple of sweet spots…

      Then after the filaments we will get to LED

  • Argon

    I have not seen this posted elsewhere. Etiam has decided to release new share issue in extraordinary general meeting. Not specific claims on LENR device but continued research on field.
    Link: http://www.etiam.fi/news.html (See Apr 15 posting)

    • greggoble

      Simply put… Many labs are replicating… and improving the low energy nuclear reactive environment. There are private/corporate research groups that have enough money and resources to make you drool and cause your eyes to pop out in delight.
      Imagine that they are as interested in this as we are.
      Also, the thing about LENR nuclear energy…
      “This is FAR from a “Narrow Band”/episodic set of physical phenomena.”

      Edisonian methods will lead to a couple of sweet spots…

      Then after the ‘filaments’, we will get to ‘LED’.

      • Michael W Wolf

        No, LED’s is a scam, don’t you know that.

  • greggoble

    The Responsibly Imaginable

    “Advanced-to-Revolutionary Space Technology Options – The Responsibly Imaginable” April 2013

    Dennis M. Bushnell, Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia
    http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20130011698.pdf

    Low Energy Nuclear Reactions, the Realism and the Outlook

    LENR could, by itself, COMPLETELY Revolutionize Space access and utilization. Although there is a quite long history of “anomalous” observations including transmutations the “recent” consideration of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions begins with the Pons/ Fleishman late 80’s observations and assertions regarding what they termed “Cold Fusion”. Subsequent difficulties with experimental replication and an utter lack of convincing theoretical explication forced research in this arena “underground” with minimal financial support.

    The current situation is that we now have over two decades of hundreds of experiments indicating heat and transmutations with minimal radiation and low energy input. By any rational measure this evidence indicates something real is occurring. So, is LENR “Real”? Evidently, from the now long standing and diverse experimental evidence – yes – With effects occurring using diverse materials, methods of energy addition etc.

    This is FAR from a “Narrow Band”/episodic set of physical phenomena.

    The next consideration is “WHAT IS REAL? WHAT IS Happening? For NASA Langley the epiphany moment on LENR was the publication of the Widom-Larsen weak interaction LENR Theory. This theory is currently under study and experimental verification [ or not] at NASA LaRC. The theory appears to explain nearly all the various and often variegated experimental observations and shifted the LENR Theoretical focus from some way of “fooling” Particle Nuclear Physics/The Strong Force to Condensed Matter Nuclear Physics, Collective Effects, The Weak Force and “Heavy Electrons”.

    The Strong Force Particle Physicists have of course evidently been correct all along, “Cold Fusion” is not possible. HOWEVER, via collective effects/condensed matter quantum nuclear physics LENR is allowable without any “Miracles”.

    The theory states that once load surfaces with hydrogen/protons and add some energy IF the surface morphology enables high localized voltage gradients then “heavy electrons leading to ultra low energy neutrons will form, neutrons that never leave the surface. The neutrons set up isotope cascades that results in beta decay and heat and transmutations with the heavy electrons converting the gamma from the beta decay into heat.

    The theory indicates several key issues/circumstances are required to enable-to-optimize LENR and explains the various experimental observations, including the often long initiation times required in some experiments. If the theory is experimentally validated in detail it provides the understanding to shift LENR research from discovery into engineering development.

    The theory indicates energy densities some million times chemical, the current experiments are in the 10’s to hundreds range. However, several labs have blown up studying LENR and windows have melted, indicating when the conditions are “right” prodigious amounts of energy can be released/produced. There are some 6 or so groups claiming device outputs in the 100 watt range and 3 others claiming kilowatts. Efforts are ongoing within NASA and other organizations to validate, or not, these claims. It should be noted that these devices are essentially “Edisonian,” the result of attempts at experimental “discovery” vice ab-initio design from the weak interaction theories per se.

    The LENR situation and outlook is therefore the following: Something real is happening, the weak interaction theories suggest what the physics might be, there are efforts ongoing to explore the validity of the theories, there are continuing Edisonian efforts to produce “devices,” mainly for heat or in some cases Transmutations. There are efforts to “certify” such devices.

    We are still FAR from the theoretical limits of the weak interaction physics and are in fact inventing in real time the requisite Engineering, along with verifying the physics. When we concentrated upon Nuclear Engineering beginning in the 1940’s we went, “jumped” to the strong force/particle physics and leapt over the weak force, condensed matter nuclear physics. We are going “back” now to study and hopefully develop this arena.

    The “Precautionary Principle” demands that we core down and determine realism for this arena, given the truly massive-to-mind boggling benefits – Solutions to climate, energy and the limitations that restrict the NASA Mission areas, all of them.

    The KEY to Space Exploration is Energetics. Some examples of what LENR might/ could enable in a resultant “Energy Rich” Exploration context include:

    – Refrigeration for Zero Boil-off cryo storage

    – Active Radiation protection

    – High Thrust Vasimir/MHD Propulsion

    – Energy Beaming

    – Separation of propulsive mass and energy/energetics to establish the requisite conductivity for most “harvested” propulsive mass including regolith

    – Planetary Terraforming

    – Ubiquitous in space and on-planet sensors and robotics

    – LEO propulsion – On planet power and energy

    – EDL retro via heating of ingested mass

    Also, The Key to SST’s and neighbor-friendly personal fly/drive air vehicles is Energetics, as simplex examples of the potential implications of this area of research. There are estimates using just the performance of some of the devices under study that one percent of the nickel mined on the planet each year could produce the world’s energy requirements at the order of 25 percent the cost of coal. No promises but something[s] seriously “strange” are going on, which we may be closer to understanding and if we can optimize/engineer such the world changes. Worldwide, worth far more resources than are currently being devoted to this research arena. Need to core down and determine “Truth”. If useful, need to engineer/apply.

    To Possibly Be

    Imaginable So Responsibly

    Creatively See
    Observational The Reality

    Hope of Theory
    Occupational A Visionary

    Energize Plea
    Survival With Planetary

    Space Faring
    Quantum LENR
    Energy
    gbgoble2013

    FARING : intransitive verb

    1. To get along
    2. To go or happen
    3. To travel; go.
    4. To dine; eat.

    Middle English faren, from Old English faran; akin to Old High German faran to go, Latin portare to carry, Greek peran to pass through, poros passage, journey.

    First Known Use: before 12th century

  • Alan DeAngelis

    No one would be granted a LENR patent now if Rossi had not gone from watt to kilowatts.