Here is another little drip of information from Andrea Rossi regarding the location of the E-Cat test:
April 10th, 2014 at 8:30 AM
Dear Andrea Rossi,
When you say that the Professors are conducting their work “in a neutral laboratory”, do you mean they are still in your premises, or instead situated in a laboratory that is not owned by you?
April 10th, 2014 at 6:02 PM
The Professors have worked and are working in a laboratory that is not owned by us, is totally out of our premises and that we never used before. We knew of it few days before the beginning of the test and sent there the E-Cat. It is located in a Country that is not Italy and is not USA. I cannot give further information, but, obviously, the precise location where the test will have been completed will be described in the Report that will be written by the Third Indipendent Party. When we arrived there for the assembling of the reactor, some of the components of the t.i.p. were already there for the set up.
This is a bit of a surprise to me, because I thought the test was taking place in the USA, but apparently not. It does make sense that since the authors are apparently all European, that it would not be taking place in the USA. If I was to make a guess, I would say that the test is happening in Sweden. The Swedish connections to Rossi and the E-Cat are quite strong, with five of the authors of last year’s test being Swedes. However, I’m prepared to be surprised.
I don’t know if is significant, but it is a little interesting to me that he says he sent the ‘E-Cat’ (singular) rather than mentioning multiple E-Cats.
Having a neutral location for this testing is very important, I think, since one of the big issues that skeptics raised about the last test was that it took place in Rossi’s own factory — which raised the possibility that he could have set up things in advance to rig the test results. I reject that theory, but it was a factor that seemed to affect some people’s reaction to the test. I hope they have taken every precaution make sure this test can’t be accused of being fraudulent