The following comment by Mike Henderson was originally posted on this thread.
The new fire seems similar to ancient fire.
When lighting a fire, conditions must be within fairly tight specs.
The ratio of fuel to air must be within certain bounds, the structure of the tinder fuel should allow for some flow-through. There must not be too much wind, nor too much moisture. An ignition source must be present and applied at the right time and place. Once lit, wood fuel must be physically supported to assure airflow.
When it doesn’t work ever time, some begin to wonder “Was this fire ever lit?” Fortunately, the new fire leaves an ash whose isotopic makeup would be difficult, at best, to fake. Unfortunately, isotopic analysis is expensive and beyond the reach of DIY experimenters.
It takes practice and patience to learn how to light a fire. Likewise, it will take time to sort out how to predictably light the new fire. We are gradually learning what those conditions might be. Parkhomov’s nickel? Chopped waveform? Temperature profile? Negative pressure? Hydrogen loading? Lithium source?
Keep up the noble work.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
New Fire and Ancient Fire Compared (Mike Henderson)
The following comment by Mike Henderson was originally posted on this thread.
The new fire seems similar to ancient fire.
When lighting a fire, conditions must be within fairly tight specs.
The ratio of fuel to air must be within certain bounds, the structure of the tinder fuel should allow for some flow-through. There must not be too much wind, nor too much moisture. An ignition source must be present and applied at the right time and place. Once lit, wood fuel must be physically supported to assure airflow.
When it doesn’t work ever time, some begin to wonder “Was this fire ever lit?” Fortunately, the new fire leaves an ash whose isotopic makeup would be difficult, at best, to fake. Unfortunately, isotopic analysis is expensive and beyond the reach of DIY experimenters.
It takes practice and patience to learn how to light a fire. Likewise, it will take time to sort out how to predictably light the new fire. We are gradually learning what those conditions might be. Parkhomov’s nickel? Chopped waveform? Temperature profile? Negative pressure? Hydrogen loading? Lithium source?
Keep up the noble work.