Mystery Video — “me356 Test” (Update: Confirmed)

Thanks to ECW reader Henry for sharing this rather mysterious video today that has been posted on the Streamable video sharing website. There is no description or explanation of it, except for the title of the video which is “me356 -test”. The video is not dated.

There hasn’t been much recent information from me356, but he has said that he his busy in developing LENR products, so maybe this video is his way of providing an update.

https://streamable.com/fh9t8

I have written to me356 asking if he could comment on what is going on — if this is indeed a genuine video produced by him.

UPDATE: I received the following from Me356:

The video is recorded by me. But it was not supposed to be shared…
The reactor was of an older test from reactor similar to the E-Cat QX. It is not replication since many data are missing. Actually it is only slightly updated version of what I was testing two years ago. In the meantime I was testing maybe thousands of similar or different reactors. So this one is probably not more interesting than the rest.
Used fuel was same that we are using in our upcoming products. It was only powered by other means – there is no heater coil at all.
So the construction is very easy and total cost for something like this is maybe 4 USD (excluding electronics). But due to nature of the design it is necessary to use higher voltage to obtain conduction line first – same as in the QX.
Then it is enough to power it with 2 – 30V depending on used modulation. Diameter of the tube is just 3mm.
Definitively it is nothing related to our products. But it is working well as long as body is holding together.

I hope that it helped.

  • спаситель русских

    It looks like Sonoluminescence

  • Alain Samoun

    Yes it will be interesting to know if it is genuine: The emission seems to be able to be turned off/on at while.

  • artefact

    On JONP:

    “Italo R. November 30, 2017 at 11:49 PM
    Dear Dr. Rossi, you wrote:
    “…The increase of power is proportional to the quantity of modules…”
    in the Stockholm demo the controller produced about 60 watts of heat to be dissipated for feeding 3 modules.
    But does it mean that feeding 100 modules, the power to be dissipated would be about 60/3 * 100 = 2000 watts?
    Kind Regards, Italo R.

    Andrea Rossi November 30, 2017 at 11:53 PM
    Italo R.:
    No. I said that the power of the E-Cat is proportional to the number of modules. The heat dissipated by the control system decreases. In a nutshell: increasing the number of modules the heat produced by the E-Cat increases proportionally, while the heat to be dissipated ( or recovered ) from the control box decreases substantially.
    Warm Regards A.R.
    P.S.
    Remember that all the heat dissipated by the control box can be recovered with COP 1.”

    • Andreas Moraitis

      “increasing the number of modules the heat produced by the E-Cat increases proportionally, while the heat to be dissipated ( or recovered ) from the control box decreases substantially.”

      Most likely he meant the absolute amount of heat in case of the reactors, but the relative amount in case of the control box. Note also that he uses different adverbs (“proportionally” vs. “substantially”).

  • Bob Greenyer

    nice

  • Bob Greenyer

    IMPO it has been clear since me356 shared video and images two years ago of SS glowing without extra input power but just stimulation frequency that he knows how to trigger the effect.

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/5b698cd8ce07c6d5d74ebe61a12272b2f504d85a8e865272302017a41bb516db.gif

    With the heater at the same temperature (but presumably lower input power), SS should not do what it appears to be doing in this image sequence.

    • Frank Acland

      More information from me356 above now.

    • Rene

      Will be interesting to see if me356 gets something reliable enough for MFMP’s usual ‘wave function collapse’ observations. It is nice he let you up close on his device. I’d love to see a solid strong signal.

  • Frank Acland

    Updated above — Me356 confirms it is his work.

    • Tested thousands of reactors? On the verge of marketing a product?

      But he couldn’t find one that worked when MFMP visited… and hasn’t invited them back yet to wipe the egg off his face?

      • Ged

        Yeah, not sure how I feel about this. If he is telling the truth, that would imply he either got super unlucky when they visited, or intentionally used a faulty device.

        But that new one without a heating coil is interesting. More plasma shenanigans!

        • AlexT

          Yeah. From Me356 we know that he is not interested in convincing us other than with ready product.
          Maybe we can consider option that MFMP was not telling the truth. I mean not everything was presented as it happened in reality. Me356 never revealed any particular about this but pointed to ask MFMP for their communication exchange. Nobody did this I guess, hehe. Moreover I highly doubt he will let them test whatever just to show he is right.

          • Bob Greenyer

            The device we tested did not produce over unity.

            The ash we tested did show transmutations, transmutations that are independently verified by experiments Ralkar and Piantelli. See ‘CAB Story’.

            This, in combination with the demonstration of switching electron cluster properties as shown below and in this video above reveals that me356 would appear to have the means to produce LENR.

    • William D. Fleming

      The latest headings say there are no comments, but here we are.

      • Frank Acland

        I know, problems with disqus.

  • pelgrim108

    Strange video from Brilliant Light Power Inc.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xueLsn-XFCc

  • Bob Greenyer

    This is the same effect as discovered by John Hutchison in 1979. Suhas Ralkar, Rossi and me356 are observing light without extra heat and it is simply an electron based phenomena when influenced by certain waveforms.

    https://youtu.be/-oKMhwk-ICo?t=24m4s

    • georgehants

      Morning Bob, please don’t talk about science beyond a steam engine or you will give all the establishment educated clones a nervous breakdown.
      ———-
      Bye, Bye, second law of thermodynamics.
      ———
      Quantum experiment reveals time really can flow backwards
      1 December 2017 By Brinkwire
      Time travel may be possible – for sub atomic particles, at least, a new experiment has found.
      Physicists have discovered that heat can
      spontaneously flow from a cold quantum particle to a hotter one under
      certain conditions – effectively reversing the ‘arrow of time’.
      While the discovery doesn’t advance the
      possibility of building a time machine, it does show the quantum world
      operates under very different rules, researchers say.
      http://en.brinkwire.com/593

    • TomR

      Thanks Bob, that same program, New Thinking Allowed, has an interview with Stephan A Swartz on remote viewing. At 16:40 to 19:20 he talks about LENR in 2050.

      • Bob Greenyer

        Thanks

        We’ll have LENR in 2050, because, after 100 years of wasting taxpayers money and scientists lives, they’ll finally realise the lie that you can’t create the sun’s fusion on earth because we don’t have the gravity and they’ll unpack what they know about Cold Fusion.

  • Adam Lepczak

    No one knows anything except me365. He has the reaction down, able to control the reactors with a push of the button and the COP is in the hundreds. Also he was able to prove his design (MK2) when MFMP was there – clearly demonstrating superior performance…


    Not

  • georgehants

    Morning Max, I just report Facts and keep an open-mind on all the opinions and speculation of others until further Evidence comes along.