Complaint of Andrea Rossi and Leonardo Corp, and License Agreement (Court Documents) — COP "Substantially Greater than fifty (50)" During Test

This document is downloaded from the United States District Court Southern District of Florida website.

http://www.e-catworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Leonardosuit01-main.pdf

UPDATE: The licence agreement between Rossi/Leonardo and IH was a supporting document posted in the court case and it has been posted here:

http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Rossi_et_al_v_Darden_et_al__flsdce-16-21199__0001.2.pdf

There’s a great deal of information in here. There are some statements in here regarding the test recently concluded:

Here are some points from the complaint regarding the test:

71. … By all accounts, the amount of energy produced by the E-Cat Unit during the Guaranteed Performance Test was substantially greater than fifty (50) times the amount of energy consumed by the E-Cat Unit during the same period.

72. On or about March 29, 2016, the ERV published his final report regarding the operation of the E-Cat Unit during the Guaranteed Performance test. In the ERV’s report, the ERV confirmed that the E-Cat Unit had satisfied all of the performance requirements imposed by the License Agreement including, but not limited to, the requirement that the production of energy was at least six (6) times greater than the energy consumed.

73. More specifically, the ERV found that over the Guaranteed Performance period, the amount of energy produced by the E-Cat Unit was consistently substantially greater than six (6) times the amount of energy consumed by the unit. In fact, the ERV found that during the testing period, the average energy multiplier (Energy Produced + Energy Consumed) was often greater than sixty (60).

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.