Scientific American has reprinted the article covering LENR/SunCell written by Steven K. Ritter which was recently published in the American Chemical Society’s Chemical and Engineering News. The only change that I can find is that it has a new title and subtitle:
It’s interesting to me that Scientific American would want to obtain permission from Chemical and Engineering News to republish this since it’s on such a controversial topic. It’s almost like they think something’s going on, but they don’t want yet to go out on a limb to cover it themselves.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
Scientific American: LENR ‘May Have Legit Results’
Scientific American has reprinted the article covering LENR/SunCell written by Steven K. Ritter which was recently published in the American Chemical Society’s Chemical and Engineering News. The only change that I can find is that it has a new title and subtitle:
“Cold Fusion Lives On, with Experiments Creating Energy When None Should Exist; The field, now called low-energy nuclear reactions, may have legit results—or be stubborn junk science” https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/cold-fusion-lives-on-with-experiments-creating-energy-when-none-should-exist/
It’s interesting to me that Scientific American would want to obtain permission from Chemical and Engineering News to republish this since it’s on such a controversial topic. It’s almost like they think something’s going on, but they don’t want yet to go out on a limb to cover it themselves.