Many people consider hydrogen to be the fuel that will wean the world off fossil fuels and reduce greenhouse gases. The production of “Blue hydrogen” has been considered to be a positive step towards zero-emission energy production. Blue hydrogen is the term used to describe hydrogen produced from non-renewable energy sources, and in which carbon produced is captured and stored so as not to enter the atmosphere as a greenhouse gas.
An article published yesterday in Energy Science & Engineering calls into question whether Blue hydrogen really is a useful ‘green’ technology.
Title: “How green is blue hydrogen”
Authors: Robert W. Howarth, Mark Z. Jacobson
Link:
“Far from being low carbon, greenhouse gas emissions from the production of blue hydrogen are quite high, particularly due to the release of fugitive methane. For our default assumptions (3.5% emission rate of methane from natural gas and a 20-year global warming potential), total carbon dioxide equivalent emissions for blue hydrogen are only 9%-12% less than for gray hydrogen. While carbon dioxide emissions are lower, fugitive methane emissions for blue hydrogen are higher than for gray hydrogen because of an increased use of natural gas to power the carbon capture. Perhaps surprisingly, the greenhouse gas footprint of blue hydrogen is more than 20% greater than burning natural gas or coal for heat and some 60% greater than burning diesel oil for heat, again with our default assumptions.”
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
Paper: “How Green is Blue Hydrogen?”
Many people consider hydrogen to be the fuel that will wean the world off fossil fuels and reduce greenhouse gases. The production of “Blue hydrogen” has been considered to be a positive step towards zero-emission energy production. Blue hydrogen is the term used to describe hydrogen produced from non-renewable energy sources, and in which carbon produced is captured and stored so as not to enter the atmosphere as a greenhouse gas.
An article published yesterday in Energy Science & Engineering calls into question whether Blue hydrogen really is a useful ‘green’ technology.
Title: “How green is blue hydrogen”
Authors: Robert W. Howarth, Mark Z. Jacobson
Link:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ese3.956
From the abstract.
“Far from being low carbon, greenhouse gas emissions from the production of blue hydrogen are quite high, particularly due to the release of fugitive methane. For our default assumptions (3.5% emission rate of methane from natural gas and a 20-year global warming potential), total carbon dioxide equivalent emissions for blue hydrogen are only 9%-12% less than for gray hydrogen. While carbon dioxide emissions are lower, fugitive methane emissions for blue hydrogen are higher than for gray hydrogen because of an increased use of natural gas to power the carbon capture. Perhaps surprisingly, the greenhouse gas footprint of blue hydrogen is more than 20% greater than burning natural gas or coal for heat and some 60% greater than burning diesel oil for heat, again with our default assumptions.”